Arguing to Theism from Consciousness

Arguing from Experience to Classifying Noisy Data

A process, based on argumentation theory, is described for classifying very noisy data. More specifically a process founded on a concept called “arguing from experience” is described where by several software agents “argue” about the classification of a new example given individual “case bases” containing previously classified examples. Two “arguing from experience” protocols are described: PAD...

Arguing from Facts to Duties (and Conversely)

One of the most controversial issues about arguments involving deontic and ethical matters is whether statements of duty or right can be inferred from statements of fact, and conversely. Most analytical philosophers have inclined to give a negative answer, alleging that duties or rights are not implied by mere facts (or the other way round), and hence that no combination of facts can imply a du...

Theism and Dialetheism

The divine attributes of omniscience and omnipotence have faced objections to their very consistency. Such objections rely on reasoning parallel to the semantic paradoxes such as the Liar or the set-theoretic paradoxes like Russell’s paradox. With the advent of paraconsistent logics, dialetheism— the view that some contradictions are true — became a major player in the search for a solution to ...

Theism & Mathematical Realism

Historically, most mathematicians have believed that mathematical truths such as "2+5=7" exist independently of human minds, being universally and eternally true. Mathematicians believe they are discovering properties of, say, prime numbers, rather than merely inventing them. This view of mathematics dates back to Pythagoras (500 BC) and Plato (400 BC). It is often called “Platonism”. In order ...

Theism and Physical Cosmology1